The Clinton campaign, along with the DNC, are both accused of disguising opposition research funding as legal expenses.Īccording to the alleged letter from the FEC, both the DNC and the campaign have agreed to pay fines as long as they do not have to admit wrongdoing. Who the money is going to, what it's for, the date it was paid, and the amount paid are all required, according to those FEC guidelines and the federal statute. Ex-British spy Christopher Steele compiled the dossier which, despite not being verified, was used to justify Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against Trump in the beginning of the FBI's Russia investigation.Ī federal statute and FEC guidelines require campaigns to disclose information on expenditures totaling more than $200. 104.3(b)(4)(i)," the alleged letter says.įusion GPS's research included the infamous Steele dossier. "The Commission further found probable cause to believe that Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as treasurer ("HFA") violated 52 U.S.C. After conducting an investigation in this matter, the Commission found probable cause to believe that the DNC Services Corp./Democratic National Committee and Virginia McGregor in her official capacity as treasurer (the "DNC") violated 52 U.S.C. Trump.Īccording to an FEC letter published by the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, both the Clinton campaign and the DNC did not correctly cite expenditures to Perkins Coie, a law firm who hired research firm Fusion GPS to gather any dirt they could on Trump. WASHINGTON (TND) - Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, along with the Democratic National Committee (DNC), have agreed to pay fines issued to them by the Federal Election Commission for describing their expenditures improperly in regard to paid research into then-presidential candidate and rival Donald J.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |